The Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to review an appeal from a coalition contesting the constitutionality of a law that paves the way for significant transformations at Ontario Place. The park, situated on the Toronto waterfront and established in 1971, featured amenities such as a large-screen movie theater, play areas for children, and pavilions suspended over the water.
Ontario’s government is looking to revamp Ontario Place by introducing a luxurious spa managed by a private entity. The Ontario Place Protectors coalition has challenged the Rebuilding Ontario Place Act, arguing that it shields governmental actions from judicial review, thus violating the Constitution. They also claim that exemptions from environmental and heritage regulations, as well as municipal noise ordinances, undermine public trust.
Previous challenges brought before lower courts were dismissed, including an unsuccessful appeal in the Ontario Court of Appeal. Justice Grant Huscroft, speaking on behalf of the Court of Appeal, acknowledged the widespread opposition to the redevelopment plan but emphasized that the court’s role is not to address political disagreements. The coalition subsequently sought permission to appeal from the Supreme Court, which has now agreed to hear the case without providing reasons.
Eric Gillespie, the lawyer representing Ontario Place Protectors, expressed satisfaction with the Supreme Court’s decision to consider the case, emphasizing the broader implications of the provincial legislation. Premier Doug Ford dismissed the coalition’s concerns, labeling them as a group of “crazy lefties” focused on protecting minimal environmental elements. Ford affirmed his commitment to the project, highlighting its potential to become a premier destination in the region.